Head-to-Head · Gateways / Routers
Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router vs MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
Scored Dimensions
7.0
Reliability & Endurance
7.5
9.5
Throughput & Performance
9.0
8.0
Connectivity & Ports
6.0
9.8
Features & Capabilities
9.0
8.8
Value for Money
8.8
Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router
The Good
- Exceptional throughput and speed, especially on 10G SFP+ ports
- RouterOS offers unparalleled flexibility and advanced features comparable to enterprise equipment
- Robust performance, handling heavy network loads with low CPU usage
- Offers strong value for money compared to more expensive alternatives
The Bad
- Requires significant networking expertise and is not user-friendly for beginners
- Winbox management tool can be challenging for non-Windows users
- Isolated reports of power supply overheating and product arriving in poor condition
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
The Good
- Delivers exceptional throughput and performance, easily handling gigabit+ internet speeds and complex network tasks.
- Offers a comprehensive suite of advanced networking features, providing granular control over network security and traffic.
- Built with robust hardware and backed by long-term software support, ensuring years of reliable operation.
- Provides outstanding value, delivering enterprise-grade capabilities at a price point significantly below comparable commercial solutions.
The Bad
- Features a very steep learning curve, making it unsuitable for average home users or those without advanced networking expertise.
- Multiple owners reported inconsistent or buggy performance with the 2.5G Ethernet and SFP+ ports, limiting their utility for some.
- Several users experienced hardware failures or received faulty units, impacting the product's overall reliability for a minority of buyers.
The Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router Verdict
The Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC is an outstanding router for those with a strong networking background seeking powerful features and exceptional performance for complex home or small business setups, but it is not suitable for casual users.
Read the full Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router consensus →The MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) Verdict
This router is an excellent choice for network professionals and power users seeking deep control and high performance for home labs or small businesses, provided they are prepared for a challenging setup and configuration process.
Read the full MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) consensus →
The Bottom Line
Our pick: Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router · 8.6/10
Owners rate the Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router meaningfully higher — 8.6/10 against 8.1/10 for the MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU). It wins where it counts: Connectivity & Ports and Features & Capabilities.
Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router
$410.00
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
$210.26
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
ORA Metrics may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you.
More head-to-heads:
Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router vs Mikrotik hEX RB750Gr3 (5-port Gigabit Router)Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router vs MikroTik hEX S Gigabit Ethernet Router (RB760iGS)Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+PC Ethernet Router vs Mikrotik CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS (High-Performance Ethernet Router)MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired)MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Mikrotik CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS (High-Performance Ethernet Router)
All Gateways / Routers rankings →
How ORA built this: We read recent reviews, remove suspected bot or incentivized entries, off-topic complaints, and reviews describing the buyer's own setup problems rather than the product, then synthesize the remainder into a single unbiased verdict. Read our full methodology →