Head-to-Head · Gateways / Routers
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4
Scored Dimensions
7.5
Reliability & Endurance
9.5
9.0
Throughput & Performance
9.0
6.0
Connectivity & Ports
6.5
9.0
Features & Capabilities
7.5
8.8
Value for Money
9.2
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
The Good
- Delivers exceptional throughput and performance, easily handling gigabit+ internet speeds and complex network tasks.
- Offers a comprehensive suite of advanced networking features, providing granular control over network security and traffic.
- Built with robust hardware and backed by long-term software support, ensuring years of reliable operation.
- Provides outstanding value, delivering enterprise-grade capabilities at a price point significantly below comparable commercial solutions.
The Bad
- Features a very steep learning curve, making it unsuitable for average home users or those without advanced networking expertise.
- Multiple owners reported inconsistent or buggy performance with the 2.5G Ethernet and SFP+ ports, limiting their utility for some.
- Several users experienced hardware failures or received faulty units, impacting the product's overall reliability for a minority of buyers.
Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4
The Good
- Exceptional reliability and endurance, with many owners reporting years of stable, uninterrupted operation.
- Outstanding throughput and performance, consistently delivering gigabit speeds for demanding connections.
- Robust feature set including dual WAN capabilities and advanced routing options for complex network setups.
- Strong value for money, offering professional-grade features at a competitive price point.
The Bad
- Non-standard port configuration and limited traditional LAN ports, often requiring additional hardware or advanced setup.
- Steep learning curve and heavy reliance on command-line interface (CLI) for advanced features, making it unsuitable for beginners.
- Initial setup can be challenging, with some users reporting difficulties following the quick start guide and needing community forum support.
- Potential for specific hardware incompatibilities, such as issues with certain cable modems or suboptimal OpenVPN performance.
The MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) Verdict
This router is an excellent choice for network professionals and power users seeking deep control and high performance for home labs or small businesses, provided they are prepared for a challenging setup and configuration process.
Read the full MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) consensus →The Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4 Verdict
This router is an excellent choice for networking enthusiasts and professionals seeking exceptional performance and deep configurability, provided they are prepared for a challenging initial setup and a command-line-heavy management experience.
Read the full Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4 consensus →
The Bottom Line
Our pick: Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4 · 8.3/10
It's close. The Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4 edges it, 8.3/10 to 8.1/10, on the strength of Reliability & Endurance and Connectivity & Ports.
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
$210.26
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4
$210.00
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
ORA Metrics may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you.
More head-to-heads:
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired)MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Ultra (UCG-Ultra)Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4 vs Ubiquiti UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max (10G Gateway)Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4 vs Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Ultra (UCG-Ultra)
All Gateways / Routers rankings →
How ORA built this: We read recent reviews, remove suspected bot or incentivized entries, off-topic complaints, and reviews describing the buyer's own setup problems rather than the product, then synthesize the remainder into a single unbiased verdict. Read our full methodology →