Head-to-Head · Gateways / Routers
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired)
Scored Dimensions
7.5
Reliability & Endurance
7.5
9.0
Throughput & Performance
9.0
6.0
Connectivity & Ports
7.0
9.0
Features & Capabilities
8.0
8.8
Value for Money
9.0
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
The Good
- Delivers exceptional throughput and performance, easily handling gigabit+ internet speeds and complex network tasks.
- Offers a comprehensive suite of advanced networking features, providing granular control over network security and traffic.
- Built with robust hardware and backed by long-term software support, ensuring years of reliable operation.
- Provides outstanding value, delivering enterprise-grade capabilities at a price point significantly below comparable commercial solutions.
The Bad
- Features a very steep learning curve, making it unsuitable for average home users or those without advanced networking expertise.
- Multiple owners reported inconsistent or buggy performance with the 2.5G Ethernet and SFP+ ports, limiting their utility for some.
- Several users experienced hardware failures or received faulty units, impacting the product's overall reliability for a minority of buyers.
Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired)
The Good
- Delivers exceptional routing throughput, consistently handling gigabit internet speeds with minimal CPU utilization and low latency.
- Provides an extensive suite of advanced networking features including VLANs, VPNs, dual-WAN load balancing, and deep packet inspection.
- Exhibits robust stability and build quality, with many owners reporting continuous, trouble-free operation over extended periods.
- Offers exceptional value, providing near-commercial grade hardware and capabilities at a competitive price point.
The Bad
- The web-based graphical user interface is frequently described as unintuitive, dated, or clunky, often necessitating reliance on the command-line interface for advanced configurations.
- Lacks integrated Wi-Fi and a dedicated switching chip, requiring separate purchases of wireless access points and network switches for most comprehensive network setups.
- Initial setup and advanced configuration present a steep learning curve for users without prior networking knowledge, occasionally leading to frustrating troubleshooting experiences.
The MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) Verdict
This router is an excellent choice for network professionals and power users seeking deep control and high performance for home labs or small businesses, provided they are prepared for a challenging setup and configuration process.
Read the full MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) consensus →The Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired) Verdict
For technically proficient users seeking a high-performance, dedicated wired router, the EdgeRouter 4 is an excellent choice. Its robust capabilities and strong performance make it an outstanding foundation for complex network environments, provided users are comfortable with CLI-based management and supplementing with external Wi-Fi and switching hardware.
Read the full Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired) consensus →
The Bottom Line
Our pick: Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired) · 8.1/10
Dead even on the headline score, but the Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired) takes more of the scored dimensions — including Connectivity & Ports and Value for Money.
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
$210.26
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired)
$210.00
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
ORA Metrics may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you.
More head-to-heads:
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Ultra (UCG-Ultra)Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired) vs Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite (ERLite-3)Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired) vs Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Ultra (UCG-Ultra)
All Gateways / Routers rankings →
How ORA built this: We read recent reviews, remove suspected bot or incentivized entries, off-topic complaints, and reviews describing the buyer's own setup problems rather than the product, then synthesize the remainder into a single unbiased verdict. Read our full methodology →