Head-to-Head · Gateways / Routers
Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+) vs MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
Scored Dimensions
6.5
Reliability & Endurance
7.5
9.5
Throughput & Performance
9.0
7.5
Connectivity & Ports
6.0
9.5
Features & Capabilities
9.0
8.5
Value for Money
8.8
Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+)
The Good
- Delivers exceptional performance, easily handling high-speed internet and advanced routing tasks.
- RouterOS provides extensive, professional-grade network optimization capabilities with good documentation.
- Strong value for money, especially for its feature set compared to higher-priced alternatives.
- Reliably supports dual-stack IPv4/IPv6, WireGuard VPN, and sophisticated traffic shaping.
The Bad
- Not suitable for beginners due to the complex RouterOS interface and steep learning curve.
- Some units exhibit noticeable fan noise, which can be a significant annoyance for owners.
- Modern units reportedly lack a USB port, despite specifications sometimes indicating its presence.
- Construction quality was noted by one owner as feeling somewhat light.
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
The Good
- Delivers exceptional throughput and performance, easily handling gigabit+ internet speeds and complex network tasks.
- Offers a comprehensive suite of advanced networking features, providing granular control over network security and traffic.
- Built with robust hardware and backed by long-term software support, ensuring years of reliable operation.
- Provides outstanding value, delivering enterprise-grade capabilities at a price point significantly below comparable commercial solutions.
The Bad
- Features a very steep learning curve, making it unsuitable for average home users or those without advanced networking expertise.
- Multiple owners reported inconsistent or buggy performance with the 2.5G Ethernet and SFP+ ports, limiting their utility for some.
- Several users experienced hardware failures or received faulty units, impacting the product's overall reliability for a minority of buyers.
The Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+) Verdict
This router is an excellent choice for experienced network administrators, power users, and small businesses seeking robust performance and deep configuration capabilities, provided they are prepared for a learning commitment and potential fan noise.
Read the full Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+) consensus →The MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) Verdict
This router is an excellent choice for network professionals and power users seeking deep control and high performance for home labs or small businesses, provided they are prepared for a challenging setup and configuration process.
Read the full MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) consensus →
The Bottom Line
Our pick: Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+) · 8.3/10
The Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+) wins on points (8.3 vs 8.1), but the MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) costs $220 less for a near-identical owner consensus. Pay for the edge, or pocket the difference.
Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+)
$429.89
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU)
$210.26
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
ORA Metrics may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you.
More head-to-heads:
Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+) vs MikroTik hEX S Gigabit Ethernet Router (RB760iGS)Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+) vs Ubiquiti UniFi Dream Machine Pro Max (10G Gateway)Mikrotik CCR2004-16G-2S+ (16x Gigabit, 2x 10G SFP+) vs Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Ultra (UCG-Ultra)MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 4MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti Networks EdgeRouter 4 (Wired)MikroTik RouterBORD 5009UG+S+ (ARMv8 CPU) vs Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Ultra (UCG-Ultra)
All Gateways / Routers rankings →
How ORA built this: We read recent reviews, remove suspected bot or incentivized entries, off-topic complaints, and reviews describing the buyer's own setup problems rather than the product, then synthesize the remainder into a single unbiased verdict. Read our full methodology →