MikroTik CSS318-16G-2S+in (16-Port Gigabit, 2 SFP+) vs TP-Link Omada SG3428 (24-Port Gigabit)
The Good
- Offers exceptional value for its feature set
- Delivers reliable and stable performance over time
- Easy to install and manage for basic L2 functions
- Compact design with versatile 10-inch and 19-inch rack mounting options
The Bad
- Lacks Power over Ethernet (PoE) capabilities
- SwOS operating system has fewer features compared to RouterOS
- Power connector placement can be problematic in shallow rack environments
The Good
- Seamless integration into Omada Software Defined Networks.
- Offers extensive management features, including a familiar CLI interface.
- Operates silently, making it suitable for noise-sensitive environments.
- Provides excellent value and performance for its feature set.
The Bad
- Multiple reports of units arriving dead on arrival or failing quickly.
- Lacks Power over Ethernet (PoE) output, leading to buyer confusion.
- Some users experienced difficulty with Omada controller adoption or stability issues.
An excellent choice for home or small office environments needing a cost-effective, managed gigabit switch with 10 Gigabit SFP+ connectivity, provided PoE is not a requirement.
Read the full MikroTik CSS318-16G-2S+in (16-Port Gigabit, 2 SFP+) consensus →This switch is a solid choice for those deeply invested in the TP-Link Omada ecosystem seeking advanced network control, provided they are prepared for potential initial setup challenges and acknowledge the reported concerns regarding product reliability.
Read the full TP-Link Omada SG3428 (24-Port Gigabit) consensus →Our pick: MikroTik CSS318-16G-2S+in (16-Port Gigabit, 2 SFP+) · 8.8/10
Owners rate the MikroTik CSS318-16G-2S+in (16-Port Gigabit, 2 SFP+) meaningfully higher — 8.8/10 against 6.4/10 for the TP-Link Omada SG3428 (24-Port Gigabit). It wins where it counts: Reliability & Endurance and Stability.
ORA Metrics may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you.