Head-to-Head · Switches
MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch) vs Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch
Scored Dimensions
9.5
Value for Money
7.5
7.0
Reliability & Endurance
9.5
9.0
Stability
9.0
4.5
Ease of Assembly
9.0
9.8
Connectivity & Ports
8.5
MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch)
The Good
- Exceptional value for money, offering enterprise-grade features at a competitive price.
- Robust connectivity with 24 Gigabit Ethernet ports, versatile PoE, and four 10Gbps SFP+ uplinks.
- Solid stability and performance, with many users reporting reliable operation over extended periods.
- Comprehensive feature set including advanced routing, VLANs, LACP, and CAPsMAN for experienced users.
The Bad
- Initial setup presents a steep learning curve, requiring advanced networking knowledge.
- Concerns about quality control, with reports of loose internal screws on arrival.
- Some users experienced fan cycling issues or found the default fans noisy.
- Security hardening is essential and not straightforward, requiring manual firewall rule configuration.
- A few reports of units failing prematurely after a few months of use.
Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch
The Good
- Exceptional reliability and consistent performance, even under demanding professional use.
- Effortless integration and management within the UniFi ecosystem.
- Highly compact design with flexible power options via PoE or USB-C.
- Offers robust managed switch features like VLANs and LAG, providing strong functionality for its price point.
The Bad
- Product descriptions frequently mislead buyers into expecting an included power adapter, which is not provided.
- The absence of an included power adapter requires a separate purchase, impacting overall value perception.
- The device lacks PoE pass-through functionality, a feature some users desired.
The MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch) Verdict
For experienced network administrators or prosumers seeking powerful, feature-rich switching and routing capabilities at an outstanding price, this device is a strong contender, provided they are prepared for a challenging initial configuration.
Read the full MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch) consensus →The Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch Verdict
This compact switch is an excellent choice for expanding UniFi networks, offering robust managed features and reliable performance, provided buyers are aware that a power adapter must be sourced independently.
Read the full Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch consensus →
The Bottom Line
Our pick: Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch · 8.7/10
Owners rate the Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch meaningfully higher — 8.7/10 against 8.0/10 for the MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch). It wins where it counts: Ease of Assembly and Reliability & Endurance.
MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch)
$474.19
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch
$50.00
Best price the consensus found
Check Price →
ORA Metrics may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you.
More head-to-heads:
MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch) vs MikroTik CRS305-1G-4S+in (10G SFP+ Switch)MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch) vs Ubiquiti US-8-60W UniFi (8-Port Gigabit PoE Switch)MikroTik CRS328-24P-4S+RM (24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch) vs Ubiquiti Networks USW-Ultra-60W (60W PoE+ Switch)Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch vs MikroTik CSS318-16G-2S+in (16-Port Gigabit, 2 SFP+)Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch vs TP-Link Omada ES208G (8 Port Gigabit Switch)Ubiquiti Compact 5-Port Gigabit Switch vs Ubiquiti Networks USW-Ultra-60W (60W PoE+ Switch)
All Switches rankings →
How ORA built this: We read recent reviews, remove suspected bot or incentivized entries, off-topic complaints, and reviews describing the buyer's own setup problems rather than the product, then synthesize the remainder into a single unbiased verdict. Read our full methodology →