MikroTik hEX PoE RB960PGS (5-Port Gigabit) vs Ubiquiti UDM-Pro-Max
The Good
- Advanced RouterOS offers extensive configuration options and enterprise-level features
- Provides solid reliability and stability for long-term operation
- Excellent value for money given its feature set
- PoE output for compatible devices, with port control for resets
The Bad
- Inconsistent gigabit throughput, with some users reporting significant speed drops
- PoE functionality is limited, often requiring a separate 48V power supply for standard devices
- Complex configuration and a dated user interface demand strong networking knowledge
The Good
- Exceptional network performance and throughput.
- Outstanding reliability and long-term durability.
- Comprehensive features and strong ecosystem for network administration.
- Excellent value for its capabilities.
The Bad
- Manufacturer support requires advance payment for critical issues.
- Physical size is noted as substantial by one owner.
- Initial setup may require careful attention to security settings for optimal configuration.
This router is an excellent choice for network administrators and enthusiasts seeking deep control and advanced features at a competitive price, provided they are prepared for a steep learning curve and potential additional investment for full PoE functionality.
Read the full MikroTik hEX PoE RB960PGS (5-Port Gigabit) consensus →For users seeking a powerful, reliable, and feature-rich gateway for home or small business, the Ubiquiti UDM-Pro-Max comes highly recommended, despite some considerations around support costs.
Read the full Ubiquiti UDM-Pro-Max consensus →Our pick: Ubiquiti UDM-Pro-Max · 9.0/10
Owners rate the Ubiquiti UDM-Pro-Max meaningfully higher — 9.0/10 against 6.6/10 for the MikroTik hEX PoE RB960PGS (5-Port Gigabit). It wins where it counts: Throughput & Performance and Connectivity & Ports.
ORA Metrics may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links, at no extra cost to you.